lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: the new VMt
On Tue Sep 26, 2000 at 05:04:06PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:17:44AM -0600, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> > Operating systems cannot make more memory appear by magic.
> > The question is really about the best strategy for dealing with low memory. In my
> > opinion, the OS should not try to out-think physical limitations. Instead, the OS
> > should take as little space as possible and provide the ability for user level
> > clever management of space. In a truly embedded system, there can easily be a user level
> > root process that watches memory usage and prevents DOS attacks -- if the OS provides
> > settable enforced quotas etc.
>
> Agreed, absolutely. The beancounter is one approach to those quotas,
> and has the advantage of allowing per-user as well as per-process
> quotas.

Another approach would be to let user space turn off overcommit.
That way, user space can be assured there will be no surprises...

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen email: andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.129 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site