[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
* Timur Tabi <> [Sep 26. 2000 17:36]:
> > Maybe this can be fixed for 2.96, but it breaks badly elsewhere (doesn't
> > compile; kernel builds but hangs/crashes at boot; kernel appears to work
> > fine while it is busy eating your disk; ...)
> Why is 2.96 so screwed up? I mean, the version numbers imply that 2.96 is a
> minor bugfix over 2.95, but your comments make it sound like it's a major
> change.

Maybe because gcc 2.96 have not been released yet, and therefore not is
bugfree yet?

/Mads Martin
Mads Martin Joergensen,
"I have a nice perspective on what it means to be in charge of the most
important project in the history of mankind."
-- Brian Valentine, Windows 2000 Project Manager
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.101 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site