lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2
On Mon, Sep 25 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > And a new elevator was introduced some months ago to solve this.
>
> And now that I done some benchmark it seems the major optimization consists in
> the implementation of the new _ordering_ algorithm in test2, not really from
> the removal of the more finegrined latency control (said that I'm not going to
> reintroduce the previous latency control, the current one doesn't provide
> great latency but it's ok).

Yes, I found this the greatest improvement too.

> As soon I patch my tree with Peter's perfect CSCAN ordering (that only changes
> the ordering algorithm), tiotest performance drops significantly in the
> 2-thread-reading case. elvtune settings doesn't matter, that's only a matter
> of the ordering.

Interesting. I haven't done any serious benching with the CSCAN introduction
in elevator_linus, I'll try that too.

--
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.196 / U:4.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site