lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: the new VMt
Date
From
> > Indeed. But we wont fail the kmalloc with a NULL return
>
> Isn't that the preferred behaviour, though? If we are completely out
> of VM on a no-swap machine, we should be killing one of the existing
> processes rather than preventing any progress and keeping all of the
> old tasks alive but deadlocked.

Unless Im missing something we wont kill any task in that condition - even
a SIGKILL will make no odds as everyone is asleep in kmalloc


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.146 / U:5.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site