[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:21:48PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> Ok, sorry. Kernel development is proceding at a furious pace and I sometimes
> lose track.

No problem :).

> I seem to remember that people were impressed by classzone, but that the
> implementation was very non-trivial and hard to grok. One of the reasons

Yes. Classzone is certainly more complex.

> There is no such thing as 'under swap'. There are lots of loadpatterns that
> will generate different kinds of memory pressure. Just calling it 'under
> swap' gives entirely the wrong impression.

Sorry for not being precise. I meant one of those load patterns.

> 'rivaling virtual memory' code. Energies spent on Rik's VM will yield far
> higher differential improvement.

I've spent efforts on classzone as well, and since I think it's way superior
approch I'll at least port it on top of 2.4.0-test9 as soon as time
permits to generate some number.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.245 / U:1.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site