Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:13:55 +0100 (BST) | From | Matthew Kirkwood <> | Subject | Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM |
| |
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, safemode wrote:
> Reply ALL also results in 2 mails being sent instead of one but of > course this is usually not a problem since one is going direct and the > other is going through vger, but still... it's kind of wasteful to > resources and i dont see any harm in Reply-to being sent in the > header. Proftpd's mailing list seems to work fine with it. Is your > position against it just due to client incompatibility?
As I see it, there are two reasons:
1. Historically, vger's turnaround time (for me at least) was several hours. This makes it rather hard to hold a coherent discussion.
2. It enables people to distinguish discussions in which they are involved from the other noise on the list.
Matthew.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |