[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, safemode wrote:

> Reply ALL also results in 2 mails being sent instead of one but of
> course this is usually not a problem since one is going direct and the
> other is going through vger, but still... it's kind of wasteful to
> resources and i dont see any harm in Reply-to being sent in the
> header. Proftpd's mailing list seems to work fine with it. Is your
> position against it just due to client incompatibility?

As I see it, there are two reasons:

1. Historically, vger's turnaround time (for me at
least) was several hours. This makes it rather
hard to hold a coherent discussion.

2. It enables people to distinguish discussions in
which they are involved from the other noise on
the list.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.105 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site