[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM
19.5 day uptime on test8 and 4.01b, ~13 segments, ~350K all user 'david'.
4 day uptime on test8 and 4.01c, ~16 segments, 256 bytes used by user

test9 is very broken, we know it is :]

There are a bunch of OOPSes and complaints about the VM.


safemode wrote:

> Ok, compiling using a cvs of X i got a couple hours ago, I'm just
> wondering what the average segment number is for SHM on an X session
> that has been up for a while .... i'll get back with any sort of info
> on if the SHM problem has been solved with this latest CVS or if it
> continues to look like a kernel SHM problem. So far though,
> 2.4.0-test8-vm3 is handling the problem Quite well as opposed to test9,
> which died in 2 hours upon booting ...and it didn't have the added
> stress of compiling X.

"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was

org:<img src="">
title:Blue Labs Developer
fn:David Ford
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.079 / U:4.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site