[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM
David Ford wrote:

> safemode wrote:
> > i'll get back about the latest xfree86 in about 2 hours .. but if anyone has any other ideas
> > or info i can give's not problem. test8 seems stable enough to keep itself up until
> > i'm ready to reboot.
> I should hope, I have a 20 day uptime so far.
> -d
> --
> "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
> virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President

hrmm.. It seems not even the mighty test8-pre6 can handle the cvs of X.. i'm using 90MB of swap
at the moment... and almost 4000 segments in shm.. it's like they never go away unless i kill X
... still trying to find the latest cvs.. it appears the module xc is not the latest ..
confusing ..anyways .. soon i will be compiling a new X and we shall see how it works.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.089 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site