[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM
Ok, compiling using a cvs of X i got a couple hours ago,  I'm just
wondering what the average segment number is for SHM on an X session
that has been up for a while .... i'll get back with any sort of info
on if the SHM problem has been solved with this latest CVS or if it
continues to look like a kernel SHM problem. So far though,
2.4.0-test8-vm3 is handling the problem Quite well as opposed to test9,
which died in 2 hours upon booting ...and it didn't have the added
stress of compiling X.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.056 / U:1.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site