lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM
Shaw Starr repored on xpert@xfree86.org that a fresh checkout of 4.01d and fresh
build of X resulted in a fixed/working shm w/ X.

-d

safemode wrote:

> When in doubt. . Blame it on the biggest piece of crap around .. X. One can
> say using a cvs of X is the cause of this by somehow i doubt it would matter. X
> needs a sane make system and i'll bet 10:1 that it's the root of this shm usage.
> But it should not be crashing the OS ...which does occur since i just went down a
> couple minutes ago. Right now it's increasing 1 segment a second it seems. it's
> at 1200 now and i give it about 30 more minutes before i crash again. I'm gonna
> run this on the test8-vm3 patched kernel i had before that was VERY good except
> for that deadlock problem that caused me to crash after 7 days. If the shm usage
> is insane on that then i'll believe it is X's fault. be back with the results
> in a few minutes.

--
"There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President


begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg">
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@kalifornia.com
title:Blue Labs Developer
x-mozilla-cpt:;28256
fn:David Ford
end:vcard
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.103 / U:6.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site