lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5
Heh. yeah.

That's all I was realy trying to point out. the fact that it was
broken. I got around the problem by prepending ../block/ to lv.c and
lv-snap.c in md/Makefile.

but whatever, like Jan said...

> Put it wherever you want. I just don't care. But make it work. ;-)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Jan Niehusmann wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 05:47:36PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> > > Yes, lvm.c and lvm-snap.c are missing from drivers/md/.
> >
> > LVM and MD have nothing common.
>
> Yes, I know. I'm not arguing about the right location for lvm. But lvm has
> been moved from drivers/block/Makefile to drivers/md/Makefile, so lvm.c
> has to follow. (Or Makefile has to be changed again)
>
> If lvm is in drivers/md or in drivers/lvm is a matter of taste. drivers/lvm
> is more logical, but having another directory for only two source files?
>
> Putting it in the same directory as md is not too bad, because both do similar
> things: They take existing block devices and somehow combine them to a bigger
> one.
>
> Put it wherever you want. I just don't care. But make it work. ;-)
>
> Jan
>

--

=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
mhaque@haque.net
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans