lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ


On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote:
>
> Is this patch acceptable?

Please explain.

The test seems to be that "if there are IO_APICs, a PnP irq _has_ to be an
IO_APIC irq".

> + if (!IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && io_apic_irqs)
> + return 1;

Which makes no sense to me. Why would a legacy irq not be acceptable?
Especially as they seem to be acceptable if there are _no_ IO-APIC irq's.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.157 / U:2.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site