Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [RFC] ioctl(2) return value | Date | Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:07:07 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> I've looked Singe UNIX Specification, Version 2 and there this seems > perfectly acceptable. > > I'd like very much to have some feedback to do the RightThing (tm). > > The alternative of course would be to add a result field inside struct > passed by pointer to ioctl call.
Linux doesnt care. If you want ALSA to run on SYS5 or BSD derived kernels you should avoid returning anything but 0/error-code from ioctls.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |