[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] ioctl(2) return value
> I've looked Singe UNIX Specification, Version 2 and there this seems
> perfectly acceptable.
> I'd like very much to have some feedback to do the RightThing (tm).
> The alternative of course would be to add a result field inside struct
> passed by pointer to ioctl call.

Linux doesnt care. If you want ALSA to run on SYS5 or BSD derived kernels you
should avoid returning anything but 0/error-code from ioctls.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.141 / U:1.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site