[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
So make noise.  I tried a post at /. but it wasn't accepted.  We have power
in our [tiny] voices when used enmasse.


Graham Murray wrote:

> David Ford <> writes:
> > There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this.
> What is the best way to handle sites which block connections using
> ECN? Is it best for everyone who detects this to write individually to
> each site which they find can be accessed with "echo 0 >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn" but not (in the default state) of tcp_ecn
> = 1? Or is there some better way to spread the word more "officially"?
> So far I have written to every site which I have been unable to
> access with ECN enabled, but the only response (apart from
> auto-responders acknowledging the receipt of the email) I have had has
> said that the matter has been forwarded to the site's IT department.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
> Please read the FAQ at

"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was

org:<img src="">
title:Blue Labs Developer
fn:David Ford
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.313 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site