[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (patch)
On Tue, Sep 19 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > But there may be several p points in the queue, how are you going
> > to keep track of all of them?
> With the current elevator there should be only 1 p point, but with the

I don't see any reason why there can't be multiple p points in the current

> modification Peter suggested there can be more and we should track the one
> more on the back of the queue. I don't think it's worthwhile.

Agree, I don't think the added complexity would be worth it.

* Jens Axboe <>
* SuSE Labs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.107 / U:0.832 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site