Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Sep 2000 21:41:17 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) |
| |
On Tue, Sep 19 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > But there may be several p points in the queue, how are you going > > to keep track of all of them? > > With the current elevator there should be only 1 p point, but with the
I don't see any reason why there can't be multiple p points in the current elevator.
> modification Peter suggested there can be more and we should track the one > more on the back of the queue. I don't think it's worthwhile.
Agree, I don't think the added complexity would be worth it.
-- * Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |