[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:16:07PM -0400, John Wehle wrote:
> Umm ... "miscompilation"? As in the compiler produced the wrong code
> based on the input provided?

That's not a gcc bug (gcc is doing the right thing). It's the kernel that
should use the "memory" clobber in the spinlock implementation.

The sad code generated was in reality the _right_ code. I was blind not
noticing the missing $ (I missed it the first time in the first testcase I
tried and I kept missing it, I was probably also biased assuming the current
spinlocks was safe with the commonly used compilers, I was thinking to fix only
a theorical bug). I'm sorry for that (and thanks again to Richard and Jamie).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.056 / U:4.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site