lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectSOLVED Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_386_PC32
Thank you Keith!

I simply deleted "__exit" from below in my
/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/rtc.c file

static void __exit rtc_exit (void)
{
/* interrupts and maybe timer disabled at this point by
rtc_release */
/* FIXME: Maybe??? */

if (rtc_status & RTC_TIMER_ON) {
spin_lock_irq (&rtc_lock); <============
rtc_status &= ~RTC_TIMER_ON;
del_timer(&rtc_irq_timer);
spin_unlock_irq (&rtc_lock); <============

printk(KERN_WARNING "rtc_exit(), and timer still
running.\n");
}

I was afraid to compile as a module because Configuration Help in
xconfig for RTC (real time clock) says:

If you run Linux on a multiprocessor machine and said Y to
"Symmetric Multi Processing" above, you should say Y here to read
and set the RTC in an SMP compatible fashion.

This says to me that in order to use RTC for SMP you must *not* build it
as a module. So I opted to edit the file.

It seems to me that the only reason 2.4.0 had compiled before was
because I had RTC checked "no" before, I noticed this in my
configuration file that I load with xconfig and changed it to yes, hence
the problem showing up.

I wonder why I could compile an SMP kernel without RTC!?! Maybe there
is a default overide that builds RTC in when SMP is checked yes. Or
maybe it didn't really build an SMP kernel without RTC, I don't know.

Anyway, thanks again for your help.

Best Regards,

Armand

--
Linux 2.4.0-test9 #1 SMP Mon Sep 18 23:34:36 MST 2000 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.023 / U:2.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site