[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2

On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> said:
> > Note that with most versions of gcc this is all a complete non-issue,
> > as most versions of gcc will _always_ inline a function that the user
> > has asked to be inlined. So the issue seldom actually comes up.
> I thought that 'extern inline' was in fact the intended usage. That way, if
> gcc decides it's not going to obey our explicit instruction to inline a
> certain function, we get to know about it.

And what could we do about it? Basically nothing.

So we might as well use "static inline".


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.071 / U:5.968 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site