[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Another problem is that bitkeeper has not been through a security audit.
> Maybe, but i like the fact that BitKeeper uses ssh by default for
> transmitting data.

That isnt the problem. Its what is in the source data you have to worry about.
CVS also uses SSH happily. That doesn't stop attacks on either by feeding the
server/input side bogus metadata

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.044 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site