Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:38:23 -0600 | From | Cort Dougan <> | Subject | Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System |
| |
} Second, I doubt very much that Linus would require BitKeeper only. It's } trivial for BK to export patches which are bit for bit identical to the } traditional "diff -Nur" output. BKweb does that on the fly, go look at } } http://www.bitmover.com:5001/patch@1.74
In fact, we do diff -uNr patches nightly at ftp://www.fsmlabs.com/pub/linuxppc/ as well as exports to a rsync tree.
} for example. I wouldn't expect Linus to require you to use BitKeeper, and } I wouldn't want you to be using BitKeeper because of that, I'd want you using } it because it saves you time and effort.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |