[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

[ outrageous cc: list trimmed ]

> > >We simply keep track of how old the oldest request
> > >in the queue is, and when that request is getting
> > >too old (say 1/2 second), we /stop/ all the others
> >
> > Going in function of time is obviously wrong. A blockdevice can
> > write 1 request every two seconds or 1 request every msecond.
> > You can't assume anything in function of time _unless_ you have
> > per harddisk timing informations into the kernel.
> Uhmmm, isn't the elevator about request /latency/ ?
> And if so, in what unit do you want to measure
> latency if it isn't time?

Number of requests which get serviced between the
insertion and completion of the request. Maybe
scaled by the average i/o queue length[0].


[0] Insert obligatory "why oh why" on Linus' not
taking SCT's sar/iostat patches.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.127 / U:6.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site