lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] Wine speedup through kernel module
Date
From

Oliver Neukum <Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
> > I think now that I'm probably best providing a generic pluggable syscall
> > handler, one that is very careful to make sure the syscall can't be entered
> > whilst the module is being unloaded.
>
> This seems to me the best idea. However I would argue against dynamically
> allocating syscalls. Reserving numbers makes for better code and allows you
> to do autoloading.

Now there's an idea... have the kernel autoload modules based on a particular
syscall number being handled in that module. Madness *grin*.

You still have to have a static syscall number though...

David Howells
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.038 / U:0.732 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site