Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 | Date | Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:23:08 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> said: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:00:29PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Shrug. So you want me to make it worse by shipping unproven code in a way > > > I can't test it ?
> > the code is in 2.4 and has been tested there though. the patches are a > > backport of the 2.4 code.
> ..so it should be at least as well tested as the USB backport in 2.2.18preX, > if not more so? Or so is implied. :)
OK, OK, OK. It is by now abundantly clear that NFSv3 is a high-priority item for lots of people out there. But just complaining about it not being in the kernel just generates ill will.
Better asK: What can _we_ do to assure Alan that NFS is up to snuff? How can we help along? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |