lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux 2.2.18pre4
Date
From
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> said:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:00:29PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Shrug. So you want me to make it worse by shipping unproven code in a way
> > > I can't test it ?

> > the code is in 2.4 and has been tested there though. the patches are a
> > backport of the 2.4 code.

> ..so it should be at least as well tested as the USB backport in 2.2.18preX,
> if not more so? Or so is implied. :)

OK, OK, OK. It is by now abundantly clear that NFSv3 is a high-priority
item for lots of people out there. But just complaining about it not being
in the kernel just generates ill will.

Better asK: What can _we_ do to assure Alan that NFS is up to snuff? How
can we help along?
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.130 / U:64.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site