[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

>> That problem: the original elevator code did not schedule I/O particularly
>> fairly under certain I/O usage patterns. So it got fixed.
>No it got hacked up a bit.

Why do you say it's not been fixed? Can you still reproduce hangs long as
a write(2) can write? I certainly can't.

>Actually my brain says that elapsed time based scheduling is the right thing
>to do. It certainly works for networks

Going in function of time it's a few liner patch with respect to the
current scheduler.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.328 / U:2.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site