[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Michael T. Babcock wrote:

>Considering there are a lot of people still using 2.0.x because they find it
>more stable than the 2.2.x series, doesn't it make sense to give this
>scalability to people who are already running SMP boxes on 2.2.x and who may
>decide to use ReiserFS?

Note that the thing isn't specific to reiserfs. All fs and networking (not
firewalling) would benfit from that.

My point is that it's more productive to solve the last 2.4.x troubles
(that still corrupts d'Itri's fs in test8) than to try to achieve better
scalability performance with 2.2.x 8).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.057 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site