[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Availability of kdb
    "David S. Miller" wrote:

    > Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 18:14:03 -0600
    > From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <>
    > Linus' apparently did not understand this, or he would have
    > immediately realized that double locking was always generating a
    > second non-cacheable memory reference for every lock being taken
    > and released.
    > Jeff, after working together with Linus for 6 or so years myself, I
    > would make a large wager that Linus understands these issues much
    > better than even you.
    > But then again, as previously stated, I don't take you very seriously,
    > but I fear that there are a few on this list who still do.
    > Later,
    > David S. Miller


    You shouldn't fault me because I worked on commercial software for so
    long. I did the hardware profiling of this stuff in 1993 -- long before
    Linux was even doing SMP. I spent many sleepless nights in Building F
    on the Provo campus comparing 'mov <addr>, 0' and "lock bts, <addr>' to
    see what would happen. Long before you guys had even written your first
    spinlock ......


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.020 / U:33.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site