[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preemption patch
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, George Anzinger wrote:
> >The times a kernel is not preemptable under this patch are:
> >
> >While handling interrupts.
> >While doing "bottom half" processing.
> >While holding a spinlock, writelock or readlock.
> >
> >At all other times the algorithm allows preemption.
> So it can deadlock if somebody is doing:
> while (test_and_set_bit(0, &something)) {
> /* critical section */
> mb();
> clear_bit(0, &something);
> }

> The above construct it's discouraged of course when you can do
> the same thing with a spinlock but some place is doing that.

Hmmm, maybe the Montavista people can volunteer to clean
up all those places in the kernel code? ;)


"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.171 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site