lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: thread group comments
From
Date
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:

> True, but this can be handled by having the master thread process catch
> SIGSEGV and redistributing the signal to all of its child-threads.

No, it cannot. We have to have a core dump with all threads.

> (The assumption I'm making here is that the master thread doesn't do
> anything except spawn all threads for the process and monitors its child
> processes for death. This is the n+1 model.)

The master thread will not anymore spawn the threads. That's the
whole purpose of this exercise.


--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.034 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site