lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> >
> > > Any of you tried copying a 2G file in the same (ext2)
> > > filesystem? It starts swapping like mad and generally behaves
> > > indecently, despite the huge 1024M of RAM it has.
> >
> > http://www.surriel.com/patches/2.4.0-t8p1-vmpatch2
> >
> > I'm working on these issues and seem to be pretty close
> > to having fixed most of them now...
>
> Got any of the standard benchmarks (bonnie?) for us to drool over? :-)

On my (puny) test system, sequential output with bonnie increased
from 3.5MB/s to 5MB/s.

But of course this doesn't really mean much. Also, IMHO the
important thing is that the machine stays perfectly usable
during the bonnie run.

regards,

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.103 / U:7.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site