lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: thread group comments
From
Date
"Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de> writes:

> Do you think the SA_NOCLDWAIT/queued exit signal approach makes sense ?

I'm not sure whether it's worth the effort. But I'm saying this now
looking at the code for another implementation following the 1:1 model.

In a second stage where we have m kernel threads and n user-level
threads (the ultimate goal) things might be different. But this is
beyond what is needed in the 2.4 kernel so lets just skip the
SA_NOCLDWAIT stuff for now.

--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.083 / U:6.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site