lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4 Status
From
Date
Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> writes:

> At 03:55 09/08/00, David Ford wrote:
> > > * SHM segments not always being detached and destroyed right ?
> >
> >Haven't seen this happen in a long time and I use shm a lot.
>
> what's your definition of "a long time".
>
> some development work that i've been doing against 2.4.0-test3-pre4
> shows that shm segments are most definitely lost and/or return to free
> verrrry slowly.
>
> (i'll be upgrading to test6-pre7 soon and if its still broken will advise)

Since the shm code was not changed for a long time (long time is since
Jun 2) please advise now!

I did not have _any_ complaints since my last patch to shm.

Greetings
Christoph

--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans