lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.4 Status
    From
    Date
    Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> writes:

    > At 03:55 09/08/00, David Ford wrote:
    > > > * SHM segments not always being detached and destroyed right ?
    > >
    > >Haven't seen this happen in a long time and I use shm a lot.
    >
    > what's your definition of "a long time".
    >
    > some development work that i've been doing against 2.4.0-test3-pre4
    > shows that shm segments are most definitely lost and/or return to free
    > verrrry slowly.
    >
    > (i'll be upgrading to test6-pre7 soon and if its still broken will advise)

    Since the shm code was not changed for a long time (long time is since
    Jun 2) please advise now!

    I did not have _any_ complaints since my last patch to shm.

    Greetings
    Christoph

    --

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.040 / U:65.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site