lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?
Date
Followup to:  <20000808162724.D23518@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
By author: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Yes. And with check they need _two_ such processes to crash the
> machine, no? Okay, perhaps we can raise limit do 9/10 or total_memory
> - 16Meg; that should prevent them ranting ;-).
> Pavel

The check should be done on the total amount of memory mlocked in the
system. This may be something that we can't do until we have the
beancounter.

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.060 / U:6.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site