Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:27:53 -0500 | From | Timur Tabi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz |
| |
** Reply to message from Nathan Paul Simons <npsimons@fsmlabs.com> on Thu, 31 Aug 2000 07:24:28 -0600
> i agree with Alan, and for more than just the above reason. One of > the rules of thumb where i work is "keep that sh*t out of our kernel!". i > don't see what the problem is with just putting the config file in a common > place and adding an extension to the end of it, ie > /boot/config-2.4.0-test1-dbg.
That's why /proc/config.gz should be an option. People who want it, like myself, can include it. People who don't, like you, can omit.
Why can't we have our cake AND eat it too?
-- Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |