[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Keith Owens wrote:

> Before Rusty tells me that not everybody uses modules,
> /lib/modules/<version> can exist even if the kernel has no modules, it
> just needs a simple Makefile change. Think of /lib/modules/<version>
> as a standard place to store information about kernel <version>.

I like the idea of a standardized repository in /lib matching the kernel.
But if it's going to do more than modules, why not rename it something more
appropriate, like /lib/kernel/<version> or /lib/linux/<version> or even
(less preferably) /lib/<version>?


Chris Ricker

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.050 / U:3.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site