Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) | From | <> | Subject | Re: RFC: design for new VM |
| |
CONFIG_VM_FREEBSD_ME_HARDER would be a nice kernel option to have, if possible. Then drop it iff the tweaks are proven over time to work better.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:08:52PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > here is a (rough) draft of the design for the new VM, as > discussed at UKUUG and OLS. The design is heavily based > on the FreeBSD VM subsystem - a proven design - with some > tweaks where we think things can be improved. > > Can the differences between your system and what FreeBSD has be > isolated or contained -- I ask this because the FreeBSD VM works > _very_ well compared to recent linux kernels; if/when the new system > is implement it would nice to know if performance differences are > tuning related or because of 'tweaks'. > > > > --cw > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |