[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: If loadable modules are covered by Linux GPL?
"Richard B. Johnson" <> writes:
> Even M$ doesn't require that I give proprietary information away.
> If Linux wants to become the new standard for the computing industry,
> GPL or whatever can't claim any ownership of the work a company
> has done while using it.

This almost seems like a troll. We who write GPLed software don't claim
ownership of other's work--we just specify the conditions under which the
others can use *our* work. What's wrong with that? Are you saying we should
just give our work away to you with compensation at all? You Communist! ;-)

Regarding Microsoft, I suppose that's true. Microsoft is about taking control
away from users and giving it to vendors, and the GPL is, to a degree, the
reverse. The smart user will gravitate towards GPLed software, and in a fair
and competitive marketplace, the smart vendors will follow.


[O]ne of the features of the Internet [...] is that small groups of people can
greatly disturb large organizations. --Charles C. Mann
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.050 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site