[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 05:10:30PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:34:00AM -0600, wrote:
> > Otherwise, there seems room in the POSIX spec to wriggle out of the STOP
> > requirement.
> That might be the case, but my concern is not POSIX but security, an
> orthogonal concept. Lax handling of STOP is a big security problem, even
> with the process-only model (see the many programs that suffice to survive
> KILL or SOTP for some time), and with threads it only gets easier.

You can't rely on signals timing anyway -- that is quite clear in the
spec and in the implementation. Especially on a SMP machine, STOP has
weak semantics and I don't see how to imrove it.

Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.061 / U:0.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site