[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 08:17:19PM -0600, wrote:
> > implementation will act as if the original exec'd program is the process
> > and does all signal handling. This process may use pthread_kill
> > to pass signals on to threads, but there is no interaction between
> There are large security considerations. A process must be KILL and
> STOPable, no matter wether it uses threads or not. every other semantics
> would be a security nightmare (or make threads a root-only interface).

That's why pthreads as a special library or executable type seems best.
Otherwise, there seems room in the POSIX spec to wriggle out of the STOP

Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.055 / U:1.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site