[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than
    On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
    > On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 08:17:19PM -0600, wrote:
    > > implementation will act as if the original exec'd program is the process
    > > and does all signal handling. This process may use pthread_kill
    > > to pass signals on to threads, but there is no interaction between
    > There are large security considerations. A process must be KILL and
    > STOPable, no matter wether it uses threads or not. every other semantics
    > would be a security nightmare (or make threads a root-only interface).

    That's why pthreads as a special library or executable type seems best.
    Otherwise, there seems room in the POSIX spec to wriggle out of the STOP

    Victor Yodaiken
    Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:3.047 / U:1.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site