[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] getting rid of the Big Kernel Spinlock, 2.4.0-test7

On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:

> Essentially, you are adding tons of scheduling points all over the
> tree and it's not a thing to make blindly...

but (except those cases mentioned above) any race that we have with the
spinlock-based BKL we are going to have with the semaphore-based one as
well, so adding (slow-path) scheduling points shouldnt be that much of a
problem. down()/up() is just as much in-line code as


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.036 / U:2.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site