lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] getting rid of the Big Kernel Spinlock, 2.4.0-test7

On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:

> Essentially, you are adding tons of scheduling points all over the
> tree and it's not a thing to make blindly...

but (except those cases mentioned above) any race that we have with the
spinlock-based BKL we are going to have with the semaphore-based one as
well, so adding (slow-path) scheduling points shouldnt be that much of a
problem. down()/up() is just as much in-line code as
spin_lock()/spin_unlock().

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.038 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site