Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:19:09 +0200 | From | Mark Kettenis <> | Subject | Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on |
| |
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:10:32 -0700 From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@sfgoth.com>
> The requirement makes sense to me, from a > user standpoint.
It would make the most sense for it to just surplant the thread that called it, I think. I don't see what the value of having all the other theads asyncronously disappear is.
How would you implement process id inheritance? I'm pretty sure that's demanded by POSIX ever since 1998.
And for 1:N thread libraries it is unavoidable.
Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |