lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:

> I am still having a problem with the way RAM is detected in the newer 2.4
> kernels, and having INITRD_START being placed above physical memory.
> My distro goes out on a lot of older 486's and previously we had no problems,
> but now it seems that with the 2.4 kernels, I get a problem with INITRD_START
> being placed above the memory top. Never had a problem in the earlier
> kernels, so is there any way I can find out WHY the changes to the RAM size
> detection have occurred, and if this is intentional, or is something that has
> slipped into the kernel. Or maybe I still am not clear or the precise
> problem here, and maybe I always had memory detection problems, but the
> INITRD_START wasn't in such a critical location :-o)

It hasn't moved. Did you try the suggestion I sent you?

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.047 / U:3.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site