Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 27 Aug 2000 00:24:40 +0200 (CEST) | From | Mike Galbraith <> |
| |
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> I am still having a problem with the way RAM is detected in the newer 2.4 > kernels, and having INITRD_START being placed above physical memory. > My distro goes out on a lot of older 486's and previously we had no problems, > but now it seems that with the 2.4 kernels, I get a problem with INITRD_START > being placed above the memory top. Never had a problem in the earlier > kernels, so is there any way I can find out WHY the changes to the RAM size > detection have occurred, and if this is intentional, or is something that has > slipped into the kernel. Or maybe I still am not clear or the precise > problem here, and maybe I always had memory detection problems, but the > INITRD_START wasn't in such a critical location :-o)
It hasn't moved. Did you try the suggestion I sent you?
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |