[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on native Linux"
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 09:59:00PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Cool problem:
> Some threaded, uh, "thing" sends SIGSTOP to one of its threads.
> The admin sends SIGSTOP to the whole group of tasks, then sends
> SIGCONT to undo the SIGSTOP. Does the thread stopped earlier
> get to continue, or does it somehow remain stopped?

It might be worth it to make SIGSTOP / SIGCONT nest properly anyway. Would
keeping a counter of the level of SIGSTOPs received violate any common
standard / break any applications ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.118 / U:1.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site