[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [FIX] Make deadlock detection work for file locking
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > I don't have POSIX in front of me, but I do not think
> > the system must detect deadlock. It is allowed to detect
> > deadlock, and in case it happens to do so EDEADLK is the
> > apprpriate error return.
> Do you know if SuS is that relaxed ?

SuS v2 saith:

A potential for deadlock occurs if a process controlling a locked region
is put to sleep by attempting to lock another process' locked region. If
the system detects that sleeping until a locked region is unlocked would
cause a deadlock, fcntl() will fail with an [EDEADLK] error.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.048 / U:2.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site