[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: flags_t
>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Zippel <> writes:

>> No it shouldn't, when using it in data structures you want it as
>> is as unsigned long for proper alignment of data.

Roman> If that flag ends up in a structure, it's a bug.

Why? Most of the time you keep it locally, but still.

>> Wrong, a lot of people keep thinking lets add yet another 500
>> typedef's but they don't buy you anything except complexity and
>> confusion. You can still play games directly on the original data
>> type.

Roman> What is complex about a typedef? It can increase readability,
Roman> it makes clear for what that variable has to used for and it
Roman> clearly tells that its value has to considered private.

No it ruins readability since you suddenly can no longer see what type
of object you are actually dealing with.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.044 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site