Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 23 Aug 2000 21:03:27 +0200 (MET DST) | From | Bjorn Wesen <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: BeOS FS support for 2.2.16 |
| |
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Miles Lott wrote: > After some pondering, I guess befs is ok? > Seems I got locked into thinking bfs, bos, fat in a circular manner. > Thanks for righting me ;)
FWIW, the book 'practical file system design' says its bfs, and that was written by a kernel engineer at Be (not saying Linux cant use any name we want, but at least they seem to call it bfs...)
-Bjorn
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |