[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PATCH: BeOS FS support for 2.2.16
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Miles Lott wrote:
> After some pondering, I guess befs is ok?
> Seems I got locked into thinking bfs, bos, fat in a circular manner.
> Thanks for righting me ;)

FWIW, the book 'practical file system design' says its bfs, and that was
written by a kernel engineer at Be (not saying Linux cant use any name we
want, but at least they seem to call it bfs...)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.042 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site