lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.0-test6 memory leak?
This would be a problem but is not reflected in how you reported it.

The most common err amongst 'newbies' is to report lost memory when the number goes
to 'only a few k left and it's never freed'.

Try 2.4.0-test7-pre6 +

I have not noticed a mem problem and I use most of my memory every day.

-d

"Forever shall I be." wrote:

> Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Forever shall I be. wrote:
> >
> > > Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > >
> > > > where do you see a leak there? I don't see absolutely anything wrong there
> > > > at all. Everything works as expected, find / should indeed use a lot of
> > > > buffers as it brings a lot of metadata in. Which bit seems suspicious to
> > > > you?
> > >
> > > > > -/+ buffers/cache: 5696 250048
> > > > > -/+ buffers/cache: 69288 186456
> > >
> > > Notice the increase in used ram. This ram is not being free'd as needed
> > > to make room for other programs (for instance, if I wanted to run a 190mb
> > > program, I would not be able to), and it's not being taken by some other
> > > process which is eating ram... I'd say that's pretty suspicious ;)
> >
> > Not at all. You need to learn how Linux (and generally UNIX) works.
> You're a few years too late for that line to work ;)
>
> > Memory is there to be used - why should give it back if it may be needed
> > again soon.
> I fail to see how holding my entire directory structure in memory (well,
> not the entire thing -- the second find went just as slow) for 15 days is
> useful... especially when I'm attempting to run programs and watching them
> get killed because there's no more memory left..
>
> > Memory used by various caches created by subsystems is not usually
> > "given back" unless memory pressure demands so.
> Right. But pressure did demand so, and give back it did not. The memory
> is lost until a reboot... processes are never given a chance to use it.
> Somehow, I don't think this is the way it should be.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tigran
> >
>
> --
> Zinx Verituse <zinx@linuxfreak.com> :(){ :|:&};:
> gpg (id 921B1558) (fp 5746 73A1 2184 A27A 9EC0 EDCC E132 BCEF 921B 1558)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."


begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg">
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@kalifornia.com
title:Blue Labs Developer
x-mozilla-cpt:;28256
fn:David Ford
end:vcard
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:37    [W:0.063 / U:1.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site