lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.x SMP scalability question.

On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> On Thursday Kanoj, Cort Dougan, DaveM and me had dinner in Mountain
> View and we decieded to tackle this bitmask problem for 2.4. Linux
> 2.6 or 3.0 will be to long in the future for SGI, so we think we have
> to already do this for 2.4.

well i protested when it was introduced initially, for exactly the same
reason :-) Basically i think it's not hard at all to avoid word-sized
bitmasks (or to define long enough ones) - if it's done right from the
start.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:37    [W:0.030 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site