Messages in this thread | | | From | "Davide Libenzi" <> | Subject | Re: new latency report | Date | Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:28:44 +0200 |
| |
> Consider making a macro UGLYSCHEDULINGPOINT for these additions so that we > can find these easily and maybe easily switch between normal and > lowlatency for benchmarking. The 'UGLY' is to do dissuade people from > overuse.
.. and makes a find+sed to easily drop it from sources when a hackless solution is found ;)
Davide
-- Feel free, feel Debian !
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |