Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:35:57 +0200 | From | Ookhoi <> | Subject | Re: ext3-0.0.2e released |
| |
Hi Chris,
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 02:30:20PM -0700, Thomas Davis wrote: > > Try 500GB. That's right. Large. Big. > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/rza1 146144 56684 81916 41% / > /dev/rza3 511858304 61405604 424845604 13% /export/data > > Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on > /dev/rza1 37760 7029 30731 19% / > /dev/rza3 2000896 303012 1697884 15% /export/data > > These crash, and it's a minimum of 3 hours waiting. > > Any idea how long it will take if the disks were 'full' -- I ask this > beaks I'm thinking about an applicator in the next couple on months > where I would have multiple 400GB raid-arrays, mostly full with small > (<10M> files. > > Because if the high fsck times, I was thinking maybe I would make > many many 50GB filesystems instead, but it's a pain to manage.
Why not use Reiserfs? I think journaling is a must with disks that large, and reiserfs is faster dan ext2 if you have a lot of files/dirs in a directory.
Ookhoi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |