Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:32:52 -0400 | From | marek@foundmon ... | Subject | Re: 2GIG-file |
| |
We'll find out in a week when we do a national broadcast ... its my head here that we are talking about
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Frankly I think LFS is ok, but for a high volume site I think I am better of > > with 2.3.99-pre9 or 2.4.test5. I could use LFS but who will support it ? At > > least in the dev kernels, there's always linux-kernel mailing list with allot of > > On my test set 2.2 + LFS patches is stable. 2.4test3 lasted at best 2 hours > of pounding, 2.4test5 crashed on boot. > > if 2.4test works for you it may well be the fastest option but it may also > be 'excessively interesting'
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |